Cemetery Discoveries: H. WÜRGES and H.A. & E.M. QUESNELL

Every genealogist should have a plaque prominently displayed on her desk: “Keep searching — you can never have too many documents!” A recent finding illustrates the thinking behind this admonition.

In an earlier post, I published a photo of the QUESNELL family gravestone in Maitland, a suburb of Cape Town. The stone listed four members of the family: Alice WÜRGES, my husband’s paternal grandmother, her sons Victor Robert and Richard John, and a daughter Esmé Doris. (Victor died during World War I and is buried in France, but his family obviously wanted to honor his memory.)

The burial place of Joseph Robert QUESNELL, the head of the family, remained unknown. However, the recently obtained Record of Burials maintained by the Maitland Cemetery shows that he was indeed buried with the rest of his family, although his name and death date, 14 Jan 1965, have never been added to the gravestone.

QUESNELL Burial Record - Maitland Cemetery Plot12951 - Maitland, South Africa - Photo by A. Clarkson

QUESNELL Record of Burials – Maitland Cemetery Plot 12951 – Maitland, South Africa – Photo by A. Clarkson

This document may not be complete; it does not list either Esmé Doris or an unnamed infant daughter who died shortly after birth in 1914, both of whose death certificates give Maitland Cemetery as the intended burial place.

However, much to my surprise, the plot does contain the graves of three other relatives.

1) Herman WÜRGES (d. 27 Jan 1920) — Alice’s father. All I had known was his name and that his wife Sarah Maria (surname unknown) was a widow when she died 13 Sep 1920 in Port Nolloth. I assumed that her husband had also died there, but I had been unable to find him in either civil records or church burial records. Now armed with his burial date and place, I was able to find his death certificate (with the surname spelled and indexed as Wurgiss) in the “Cape Province, Civil Deaths, 1895-1972” database at FamilySearch. It states that after more than five months of illness, he died of “a cancer in [the] neck and exhaustion” at Old Somerset Hospital. Why he died so far from where he and his wife lived is a matter for speculation. His occupation was “boatman” so perhaps he had been on a ship docked in Cape Town when he fell ill. Perhaps his cancer was of a type or severity that required treatment in a larger hospital than the one in Port Nolloth. Sarah died only seven months after her husband; perhaps she had been too ill to care for him so their only child, Alice, had taken him into her home. Both Herman and Sarah were only 58 years old when they died.

2) Harriet Annie QUESNELL (d. 26 Dec 1931) — Joseph Robert’s sister. Although her death certificate states that she is married, her residence address is that of her brother, 171 Buitengracht Street, Cape Town. Her first marriage was to John HAMER; I’ve been unable to find out whether they had any children and whether he died or their marriage ended in divorce. At the time of her death, her surname was MCLUCKIE. Her death certificate was signed by A. MCLUCKIE, presumably her husband, who gives the same address.

3) Elizabeth Mary QUESNELL (d. 12 Sep 1937) — Joseph Robert’s sister. Elizabeth was the widow of William JANSEN, a seaman from Finland who had died in 1915 in Port Nolloth. Her Death Notice shows only three of her six children as still living: Edgar Ernest (b. 1895), Edith Gladys (b. 1898), and Arthur Alexander (b. ?). She has a separate headstone.

From now on, my research will always include cemetery burial records. These unassuming little cards can not only save time searching for a death date with which to browse un-indexed South African death certificates and probate records, but can lead to unexpected information. I’m already considering what might be found in mortuary records, another under-used resource.

Research Notes

After the death of Alice WÜRGES, Joseph Robert QUESNELL married Charlotte Louisa VAN REENEN 27 Jan 1942. She died 12 Mar 1962. According to a transcription on the now-defunct site Ancestry24, she was buried in St. Peter’s Cemetery in Observatory, a suburb of Cape Town. Unfortunately, although Ancestry24 was purchased by Ancestry.com, many of their databases have yet to be made available on the latter’s site. The cemetery has been replaced by a shopping mall, but I have read that the gravestones were photographed by the National Heritage Council before that event.

The database “South Africa, Cape Province, Civil Deaths, 1895-1972” on FamilySearch is not yet complete; the last records are from 1954, and the database has not been updated in the past year. It is only partially indexed.

Next Steps

1) Two positions, A and C, are noted on the Record of Burials, but a photo shows the plot with three grave sites bordered by a common concrete curb. Contact the cemetery office to find out where B is located in relation to A and C and who is buried in position B.

2) Six burials — eight including the unrecorded children — would have necessitated multiple burials in each grave. This also seems likely from the notations of depth ranging from 5 to 8 ft. for all but the grave of Herman WÜRGES. Contact the cemetery for clarification.

3) Since Joseph Robert QUESNELL and his only surviving son, my husband’s father, had been estranged for some years, there is a question about who arranged for the burial. “H & Pitt” is listed as “undertaker” for the burial; an online search suggests that this is Human & Pitt Funeral Services with several locations in the Western Cape. Contact the location in Cape Town to get a copy of the pertinent record.

4) Check the availability of the National Heritage Council photographs of the gravestones from St. Peter’s Cemetery, Observatory; the location of the cemetery records, and the current location of the remains that were removed.

 

 

Posted in HAMER, JANSEN, MCLUCKIE, QUESNELL, WÜRGES | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Searching for a Father: Sara Magdalena (1709 – aft. 1750)

There’s nothing like a tempting new genealogy mystery to keep enthusiasm running high!

A two-part article published last year in Genesis by the Genealogical Society of South Africa had shown that my husband’s 6x great-grandmother, Sara Magdalena, was “probably not” the daughter of Andreas OELOFSE, although her mother Sara JANSZ was his wife and likely his widow by the time of the child’s baptism (see earlier post).

The author’s reasons did not fully convince me, possibly because I was still hoping that mutineer and convict-at-hard-labor Andreas would be a good candidate for family black sheep. And I thought there was enough “wiggle room” in his timeline to allow the possibility that he was the child’s father, but that she had been born after his death.

However, Anne Clarkson, a researcher in Cape Town who has wide experience working with early records from the Cape, reviewed the research and was persuaded by the evidence, especially the baptism record, a copy of which she forwarded to me.

5 May 1709 Baptism Record for Sara Magdalena JANSE - Dutch Reformed Church - Stellenbosch - Cape Archives

5 May 1709 Baptism Record for Sara Magdalena JANSE – Dutch Reformed Church – Stellenbosch – Cape Archives

“The most telling point, to my mind, is that her father is ‘onbekend’ in the baptism register. If a father had already died by the time his child was baptised, this is usually indicated in some way.…But, generally speaking, when the father is described as ‘unknown’, the child was born outside marriage.”

So I bowed to Anne’s superior experience. But that didn’t mean that I sighed and turned to other matters. In fact, after the initial deflation of acknowledging that Andreas was not in the family line, I perked up to the challenge of finding out the identity of Sara Magdalena’s “unknown” father.

The baptism record kept nagging at me. Why did her mother decline to name the birth father? It’s not difficult to imagine that in a town the size of Stellenbosch, most of the town, including the minister, would have known the father’s identity. But for some reason, they weren’t divulging this information for the record.

A logical explanation might be that the natural father was a person of some standing in the community and thereby considered above the law and that neither Sara JANSZ nor the minister was prepared to face the consequences of naming him.

The second Genesis article gave one clue to follow. Widow Sara JANSZ’s estate inventory of 12 Jun 1713 listed her and Andreas’s seven children in descending birth order, all with the surname OLOFSZ. At the end of the list was her youngest child, Sara [Magdalena], with the surname MEURS. Assuming that this was the surname of the child’s father, was she listed with this surname because the inventory was a legal document with negative consequences for incorrectly stating information? Or was the natural father dead by the time the inventory was drawn up?

Fortunately, the author of the Genesis articles cited www.tanap.net as one of her sources. The TANAP site showed two searchable databases for the Cape of Good Hope. The first, Inventories of the Orphan Chamber, listed four documents for the years 1709 and 1710 in which a man named Samuel Martini DE MEURS bought property from the estates of deceased persons. He is the only person of that surname in these records. In the last three documents, his title is given as landdrost, or chief magistrate of the district.

The other TANAP database, Resolutions of the Council of Policy, yielded six documents with dates ranging from 7 May 1707 to 11 Mar 1710 in which DE MEURS is listed as the  landdrost. Three additional documents in the years 1716, 1720, and 1724 mention his “widow” Aletta BECK who had remarried in Dec 1715. Church records show that she and DE MEURS had married in 29 Dec 1709, eight months after Sara Magdalena’s baptism.

What might have been the effect on both his position in the government and his impending marriage if it had been known that he had fathered an illegitimate child? Studying the timeline of events, it appears that Sara Magdalena’s mother and DE MEURS were probably involved in an adulterous affair prior to the death of OELOFSE, thereby adding to the scandal that likely would have resulted from an open admission of paternity.

My reasoning about Sara Magdalena’s baptism record seemed to have some validity. Samuel DE MEURS was an important personage in Stellenbosch. An online biography of Aletta BECK states that she was the sister-in-law of a Dutch East India Company (VOC) official, thus making it more likely that her husband-to-be would have wanted to keep secret his fathering of a child.

BECK’s biography also indicates that “as early as the beginning of 1711,” DE MEURS had died following a long illness, which supported my reasoning that Sara JANSZ’s inventory listed her youngest child’s surname because the birth father was no longer alive.

I was convinced that I had found Sara Magdalena’s father. Hoping that Anne Clarkson would concur with my conclusion and also find additional supporting documents in the archives, I compiled the above information and was preparing to send the list to her in Cape Town.

But, right before e-mailing the document, I did a final online check on DE MEURS — with astonishing results!

(To be continued…)

Research Notes

TANAP is an acronym for Towards A New Age of Partnership in Dutch East India [VOC] Archives and Research. Two of its objectives are to preserve the VOC archives and improve accessibility to them. There are two searchable online databases for the Cape of Good Hope: 1) Resolutions of the Council of Policy – The Council of Policy was the highest authority of the VOC at the Cape of Good Hope. The Council discussed all problems that arose and took decisions on governing the settlement. The minutes, which include reports and decisions taken, are called the Resolutions of the Council of Policy. The transcriptions of these documents are available on the site, and 2) Inventories from the Orphan Chamber – The establishment of the Orphan Chamber at the Cape of Good Hope arose out of the need to provide for the collection and administration of the property of persons who died intestate and left heirs who were absent from the Colony or who were under age.

The biography of Aletta BECK, wife of Samuel Martini DE MEURS, is included in Digitaal Vrouwenlexicon van Nederland (DVN), an online dictionary of Dutch women. It states that Aletta was the “only heir” of DE MEURS.

Next Step

Try to locate a probate or inventory record for the estate of Samuel Martini DE MEURS.

 

 

 

 

 

Posted in BECK, JANSZ, MEURS/DE MEURS, OELOFSE | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Not Our Black Sheep?: Andreas OELOFSE (ca. 1642 – ca. 1709)

Like many genealogists, I love finding black sheep in the family, those ancestors whose behavior falls far outside the accepted norms of the time and place in which they lived, perhaps even outside those of our own more open-minded times. Unfortunately, when I find such a person in a usually pedestrian family tree, I may throw genealogical search standards to the wind in a rush to claim him or her. So it was with Andreas OELOFSE, my husband’s 7x great-grandfather through his youngest daughter Sara Magdalena.

Image courtesy of Feelart at FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Image courtesy of Feelart at FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Based on information I had found several years ago in Geslagregisters van ou Suid Afrikaanse Families as published on the now-defunct Ancestry24 site, I added Andreas, his wife Sara JANSZ, and their children to my husband’s tree. Like all conscientious researchers, I planned to gather documentation to verify his marriage and the vital information about his wife and children — someday.

When the quarterly publication Genesis arrived last August from eGSSA, the online branch of the Genealogical Society of South Africa, it contained an article by member June Barnes about Andreas, who was also her 7x great-grandfather. And to my delight, her research showed that he was the “baddest” black sheep I had ever found in anyone’s tree!

Andreas, a Norwegian, arrived at the Cape of Good Hope in 1668 as an employee of the Dutch East India Company, which recruited men from all over Europe. Unlike most of the other men, however, during the voyage out he had taken part in an unsuccessful mutiny, having agreed “to help murder all the ship’s officers as well as to enter the cabin of the constable and murder everyone there.” He was sentenced to a severe lashing and “…to serve 25 years in chains on public works without pay and be banned to Robben Island….”

In my haste to get to the “good stuff,” I had blithely skipped over the last sentence of the editor’s introduction to the article which stated that the “conclusions” would be published in the November issue of Genesis. I could fault June for not hanging a red flag over that word, but any experienced genealogist would have been on high alert just by reading it. Instead, I trumpeted the discovery of their ancestor’s misdeeds to my husband and his brother — and to anyone else who would listen. Surely, the second part of the article would just clarify how Andreas, even after being sentenced to additional years for yet another crime, had managed to serve only 22 years of his combined sentences before he married in 1690, presumably as a free man, and became father to a family with Sara Magdalena as his youngest child.

Due to a mix-up about my membership renewal, I didn’t receive the November issue until recently. One conclusion in the second half of the article was quite different from what I had expected and threatened to lop off that branch of my husband’s family tree, thereby losing the distinction of his having an ancestor who was a mutineer: “Sara Magdalena was probably not the child of Andreas Oelofse.”

This experience taught me yet again that one shouldn’t add someone to the family tree based on incomplete or unproven information. However, even though June had obviously done a lot of solid research to come to her compelling conclusion, I wasn’t ready to concede that Andreas is not my husband’s ancestor. I latched on to her use of the word “probably” to qualify her statement and determined to do as much additional research as I could to prove or disprove it. In doing so, I learned far more than I could have anticipated.

(To be continued…)

 

Posted in JANSZ, OELOFSE | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment